MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W624838917 · doi:10.4000/lha.314

Un architecte de la Ville de Paris Léon Salleron (1820-1904)

2013· article· fr· W624838917 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueLivraisons d histoire de l architecture · 2013
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Urban and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsBibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Claude Augustin Léon Salleron naquit le 29 décembre1820 à Paris, dans une famille de tanneurs. Il entre à l’École des beaux-arts en 1842 après avoir travaillé dans l’atelier de Duban. Parallèlement il suit les cours de l’École centrale des arts et manufactures et entre comme conducteur de travaux à la Ville de Paris où il fera toute sa carrière, prenant sa retraite en 1879 comme architecte de 1ère classe. Considéré comme éclectique par Hautecoeur, il se rapproche cependant de l’école rationaliste dans ses constructions scolaires simples et fonctionnelles. D’abord chargé du 20e arrondissement pour lequel il construit les nouvelles casernes d’octroi, quelques écoles et la nouvelle mairie, il devient responsable des bâtiments scolaires en 1877. À ce titre il est désormais considéré comme un véritable spécialiste de la question et participe à de nombreuses commissions et jurys. Outre son activité publique il réalise de nombreuses constructions pour une clientèle privée, hôtels particuliers et immeubles à loyers à Paris, châteaux et villas à Versailles et en province.Il est récompensé de prix aux expositions universelles de 1873, 1875 et 1878 et par une médaille de la Société des architectes en 1880 pour ses travaux d’architecture privée, décoré de la Légion d’honneur en 1884.Il mourut le 19 novembre 1904 à Versailles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.208
Threshold uncertainty score0.414

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0330.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLivraisons d histoire de l architectureSame topicFrench Urban and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207