MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W624857675 · doi:10.7567/jjap.54.07hf01

A method to reduce the influence of reflected waves on shear velocity measurements using B-mode scanning time delay

2015· article· en· W624857675 on OpenAlexaff
Zhen Qu, Yuu Ono

Bibliographic record

VenueJapanese Journal of Applied Physics · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUltrasound Imaging and Elastography
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsShear (geology)Imaging phantomAcousticsOpticsShear wavesFilter (signal processing)UltrasoundMaterials sciencePhysicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A method to reduce the influence of reflected shear wave (SW) on ultrasound measurement of shear velocity of a soft tissue specimen was proposed in this study. A backward SW reflected from tissue boundaries may interfere with a forward SW induced, resulting in shear velocity measurement error. In the B-mode scan of a conventional ultrasound imaging system there is a scanning time delay among the sequential A-mode measurements, which causes an artificial spatial frequency shift in the forward and backward SWs. The amount of the frequency shift is dependent on the propagation direction of the SWs with respect to the B-mode scanning direction. Therefore, the forward and backward SWs can be separated using a spatial frequency filter. The proposed method was verified using a soft tissue mimicking phantom. In the experimental results, the artificial frequency shifts were clearly observed for induced and reflected SW. Shear velocities of the phantoms were successfully measured from the filtered SW by the proposed method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJapanese Journal of Applied PhysicsSame topicUltrasound Imaging and ElastographyFrench-language works237,207