Cognitive-behavioral conjoint therapy for PTSD: Harnessing the healing power of relationships.
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Part I: Background and Overview of CBCT for PTSD. An Introduction to Cognitive-Behavioral Conjoint Therapy. Initial Assessment, Case Conceptualization, and Working with Complex Cases. Part II: CBCT for PTSD Treatment Manual. Phase 1. Rationale for Treatment and Education about PTSD and Relationships. Session 1. Introduction to Treatment. Session 2. Safety Building. Phase 2. Satisfaction Enhancement and Undermining Avoidance. Session 3. Listening and Approaching. Session 4. Sharing Thoughts and Feelings: Emphasis on Feelings. Session 5. Sharing Thoughts and Feelings: Emphasis on Thoughts. Session 6. Getting U.N.S.T.U.C.K. Session 7. Problem Solving to Shrink PTSD. Phase 3. Making Meaning of the Trauma(s) and End of Therapy. Session 8. Acceptance. Session 9. Blame. Session10. Trust. Session 11. Control. Session 12. Emotional Closeness. Session 13. Physical Closeness. Session 14. Posttraumatic Growth. Session 15. Review and Reinforcement of Treatment Gains.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it