MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W625684250

The Ermatingers: A 19th-Century Ojibwa-Canadian Family

2007· book· en· W625684250 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
W. Brian Stewart

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdventureGrandparentHEROHistoryIndex (typography)Late 19th centuryPerformance artGenealogyGeographyArt historyArtLawPolitical sciencePeriod (music)Literature
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Figures Acknowledgments Introduction 1 The Urban Canadian Grandparents 2 The Upper Country Ojibwa Grandparent 3 Charles Sr's Fur Trade Career 4 Charles and Charlotte in Montreal 5 A Wild Man's Land and a World of Virgil 6 Farmer and Cavalry Man: Charles Jr 7 Ojibwa Chief and Montreal Policeman: Charles Jr 8 Soldier, Clerk, and a Last Adventure: James 9 Dandy Turned Hero: William 10 Suppressing Riots in Montreal: William 11 Murder, Militia, and Military Intelligence: William 12 The Ermatinger Women 13 A Lost Past, a Future Unattained Appendices Notes Bibliography Index

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.096
Threshold uncertainty score0.698

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0560.007
Scholarly communication0.0070.002
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0380.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCanadian Identity and History→French-language works237,207→