MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W625715975 · doi:10.1177/002070201006500223

Alliance and Illusion <i>Canada and the World, 1945-1984</i>

2010· article· en· W625715975 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal Canada s Journal of Global Policy Analysis · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Policy and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProsperityDiplomacyAlliancePolitical scienceForeign policyInnocenceNational securityPolitical economyEconomic historyLawSociologyPoliticsHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction 1 Construction and Reconstruction: Canada in 1945 2 Real Prosperity and Illusory Diplomacy 3 Realigning Canadian Foreign Policy, 1945-1947 4 Dividing the World, 1947-1949 5 Confronting a Changing Asia, 1945-1950 6 From Korea to the Rhine 7 The Era of Good Feeling, 1953-1957 8 Diefenbaker and the Dwindling British Connection 9 Nuclear Nightmares, 1957-1963 10 Innocence at Home: Economic Diplomacy in the 1960s 11 Innocence Abroad: Fumbling for Peace in Indochina 12 Vietnam and Canadian-American Relations 13 National Unity and Foreign Policy 14 Changing the Meaning of Defence 15 National Security and Social Security 16 The 1970s Begin 17 Parallel Lives: Nixon Meets Trudeau 18 The Pursuit of Promises 19 Canada First, 1976-1984 20 Returning to the Centre Conclusion: Multilateral by Profession, Muddled by Nature Notes Further Reading Index

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.562
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it