MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W626389419

Global multiculturalism : comparative perspectives on ethnicity, race, and nation

2001· book· en· W626389419 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Grant H. Cornwell, Eve Walsh Stoddard

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCaribbean history, culture, and politics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMulticulturalismGender studiesPoliticsIdeologyPolitical scienceNational identityCitizenshipEthnic groupCulturalismSociologyLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chapter 1 Introduction: National Boundaries/Transnational Identities Part 2 Part I: Multi Culturalism and Ethnicity: Contested Ownership of National Culture Chapter 3 Miscegenation as a Metaphor for Nation Building: The 'Douglarisation' Controversy in Trinidad and Tobago Chapter 4 The Chinese in Thailand: Ethnicity and Power Chapter 5 To Be French: Franco-Maghrebians and the Commission de la Nationalite Chapter 6 Spectacular Imaginings: Performing Community in Guatemala Part 7 Part II: Multiculturalism and Race: Alternative Constructions of Black and White Chapter 8 Brazil: Interactions and Conflicts in a Multicultural Society Chapter 9 Songs in a Strange Land: Race, Dual Consciousness, and the Narrative of African-American Identity in the United States Chapter 10 Letting the Side Down: Personal Reflections on Colonial and Independent Kenya Chapter 11 Race in the Formation of Cuban National and Cultural Identity Part 12 Part III: Multiculturalism and Politics: Constitutional Approaches to Inequality Chapter 13 The Zimbabwe Constitution: Race, Land Reform and Social Justice Chapter 14 Bosnia: Two Days in November Chapter 15 The Crisis of the Mexican State and the Nation: Chiapas as Metaphor Chapter 16 China's Ethnicities: State Ideology and Policy in Historical Perspective Chapter 17 Official Multiculturalism in Canada: Between Virtue and Politics

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.588
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations51
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCaribbean history, culture, and politicsFrench-language works237,207