MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W626438610

Design and Implementation of Slot Left-Turn Lanes on the Manitoba Highway Network

2013· article· en· W626438610 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
B Hartmann, D Durant

Bibliographic record

Venue2013 CONFERENCE AND EXHIBITION OF THE TRANSPORTATION ASSOCIATION OF CANADA - TRANSPORTATION: BETTER - FASTER - SAFER · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTraffic Prediction and Management Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSignageTransport engineeringIntersection (aeronautics)ConfusionChannelizedFootprintComputer scienceEngineeringTelecommunicationsGeographyBusiness
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Provincial Trunk Highway (PTH) 12 in the City of Steinbach, Manitoba, is a 4-lane divided roadway. As it was originally designed to expressway standards, the medians are wide to provide appropriate separation of traffic. Making direct left turns from PTH 12 is problematic because the large intersection footprint results in poor sightlines when signalized and adds to driver confusion, with many drivers making left turns by passing opposing left-turn traffic on the right. The City of Steinbach has seen rapid growth over the past decade, and development along PTH 12 has necessitated the improvement of operations at several intersections. Manitoba Infrastructure and Transportation (MIT) has begun implementing slot left-turn lanes in an attempt to remediate these issues. Three intersections in Steinbach have received this treatment over the past seven years and public reaction appears to be positive. Proper selection of design speed and vehicle are crucial when designing slot left-turn lanes. Furthermore, signage and lane markings must be appropriate for both seasoned urban drivers and rural drivers who are unfamiliar with this form of channelization. The configuration and location of a raised divisional island must take into account maintenance (snow clearing) and emergency vehicle access. MIT has used the knowledge gained in designing, constructing and operating slot left-turns to refine the design for future applications. (A) For the covering abstract of this conference see ITRD record number 201310RT334E.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.737
Threshold uncertainty score0.522

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.181
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2013 CONFERENCE AND EXHIBITION OF THE TRANSPORTATION ASSOCIATION OF CANADA - TRANSPORTATION: BETTER - FASTER - SAFERSame topicTraffic Prediction and Management TechniquesFrench-language works237,207