Climate change and philosophy : transformational possibilities
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abbreviations Introduction Part I: Questioning Modernity 1. Climate Change, Civil Progress, and Rational Evolution, Martin Schonfeld (University of South Florida, USA) 2. Nature in the Active Voice, Val Plumwood (Australian National University, Australia) 3. Climate Change and Nihilism: Living in the Zone of Nihilism, Ruth Irwin (University of Auckland, New Zealand) Part II: Transforming Global Politics 4. Transforming Worldviews to Cope with a Changing Climate, Leo Elshof (Acadia University, Canada) 5. Education at the End of Nature: Learning to Cope with Climate Change, Timothy Luke (Virginia Tech, USA) 6. Education Against Climate Change: Information and Technological Focus Are Not Enough, Edgar Gonzalez Gaudiano (Autonomous University of Nuevo Leon, Mexico) Part III: Global Environmental Justice 7. Global Climate Change, Adaptation and Abatement in a Context of Risk and Vulnerability, Leslie LeGrange (Stellenbosch University, South Africa) and Heila Lotz-Sisitka (Rhodes University, South Africa) 8. Gender and Climate Change: An Environmental Justice Perspective, Patricia Glazebrook (Dalhousie University, Canada) Part IV: Liberal Responsibility 9. Mediated Responsibilities, Global Warming and the Scope of Ethics, Robin Attfield (Cardiff University, UK) 10. Transforming Attitudes to Environmental Law in Light of Climate Change, Murray Sheard (Director of Professional Integrity Training, Tiri, UK) Bibliography Index.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it