Bibliographic record
Abstract
What Is Your Diagnosis? HistoryA 5-month-old 12.5-kg (27.5-lb) castrated male mixed-breed dog was evaluated because of dyspnea of 3.5 months' duration.Bronchitis had been diagnosed in the dog when it was 5.5 weeks old.A heart murmur was detected at that time.The dog was treated for bronchitis and the cough resolved; however, dyspnea, exercise intolerance, and the heart murmur persisted.On physical examination, the dog was lethargic, was moderately dyspneic, and had frequent bouts of moist, productive coughing.The strength of peripheral pulses was fair to weak.The heart rate was within reference range (200 beats/min; reference range, 70 to 220 beats/min), and rhythm was regular.A grade 4/6 systolic murmur was detected during auscultation of the thorax, with the point of maximum intensity at the left heart base.Results of CBC indicated a mild increase in RBCs (9.40 X 10 12 cells/L; reference range, 5.5 to 8.5 X 10 12 cells/L); however, Hct (0.52 L/L; reference range, 0.37 to 0.55 L/L) and total protein concentration (69 g/L; reference range, 51 to 72 g/L) were within reference ranges.Radiographs of the thorax were obtained (Figure 1). In cooperation with
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.009 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".