MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W627470480

MONORAIL IS NOT SURE BET YET FOR VEGAS OR DESIGN-BUILDERS

2004· article· en· W627470480 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
T Illia

Bibliographic record

VenueENR · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTransportation Safety and Impact Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMonorailLas vegasDamagesPlan (archaeology)Transport engineeringEngineeringBusinessOperations managementCivil engineeringPolitical scienceGeographyLawArchaeologyMetropolitan area
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Las Vegass high-speed monorail system, originally scheduled to open in January 2004, will now debut in summer 2004 if all goes according to plan. The opening was delayed after a driveshaft fell off a train in a test run. The monorail, which will carry 8,000 passengers hourly between the citys convention center and eight resorts, must operate at 98% of its intended capacity for one month before it can be opened to the public. The delays may prove problematic for Bombardier. Although it purchased insurance against a late opening, the Canadian supplier may still have to pay stiff fines. Liquidated damages were at $9.26 million at last count and rising by $85,000 each day, and Bombardier is expected to have to pay a large portion of those penalties.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.267
Threshold uncertainty score0.892

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2670.090

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueENRSame topicTransportation Safety and Impact AnalysisFrench-language works237,207