MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W62774922 · doi:10.3138/cjh.49.2.179

Asleep by a Frozen Sea or a Financial Innovator? The Hudson’s Bay Company, 1714-63

2014· article· en· W62774922 on OpenAlex
Mike Wagner

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of History · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCompetitor analysisInnovatorShareholderRevenueFlexibility (engineering)BusinessCash flowFinanceCashEconomicsManagementMarketingCorporate governance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

‘Asleep by a frozen sea’ is a description of the early history of the Hudson’s Bay Company (HBC) that has persisted since the mid-eighteenth century. The management of the company prior to the Seven Years War (1756-63) has received decidedly mixed reviews. In particular, the company has been criticized for a lack of initiative in North America relative to its French rivals. This article re-assesses the operations of the company from the perspective of its British managers. It examines what they sought to achieve as well as how they generated revenues, controlled costs and managed their cash flow. This analysis reveals that, far from being ‘driven to the wall’ by its French competitors, the HBC, through careful control of costs and an innovative approach to financial management, protected the interests of its shareholders while ensuring considerable operational flexibility in North America.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.383
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it