MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W62878923 · doi:10.2741/3980

Regulation of cellular responses by deubiquitinating enzymes: an update

2011· review· en· W62878923 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in bioscience · 2011
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicUbiquitin and proteasome pathways
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersBiotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilQueen's University BelfastQueen's UniversityCancer Research UK
KeywordsDeubiquitinating enzymeUbiquitinEnzymeContext (archaeology)Cell biologyFunction (biology)IntracellularUbiquitinsChemistryBiologyBiochemistryUbiquitin ligaseGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The conjugation of ubiquitin as either a monomer or as a chain has long been known to regulate the stability, localisation, trafficking and/or function of many intracellular proteins. However, the recent explosion in our knowledge of the enzymes responsible for the removal of ubiquitin suggests they also play an important role in the regulation of many processes. Here we examine what is known about the role of deubiquitinating enzymes (DUBs), with particular emphasis upon their impact on cellular responses to external stimuli. In addition, we look at the evidence that although these enzymes are heavily outnumbered by those responsible for ubiquitin conjugation, that these enzymes may still be important cellular regulators, due to their ability to play multiple roles which can be cell type and cell context specific.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in bioscienceSame topicUbiquitin and proteasome pathwaysFrench-language works237,207