Globalization, Governance and Identity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet ouvrage en anglais fait suite à des débats engagés au cours d'une table ronde sur la mondialisation, organisée à Québec en 1998 par l'International Political Science Association. Les différentes contributions qu'il regroupe se répartissent entre trois sections. La première s'interroge sur le statut théorique de la mondialisation et sur les rapports des États au capitalisme mondial et aux sociétés transnationales ; on y rappelle, entre autres, que les mêmes qui font pression pour réduire le rôle de l'État (démantèlement de l'État-providence, déréglementation et privatisation) exigent en même temps une intervention étatique accrue en d'autres domaines (contrôles sociaux plus efficaces). La seconde section analyse divers cas d'adaptation de l'État-nation au contexte nouveau de la mondialisation, que ce soit des cas d'intégration (comme la réunification allemande) ou de désintégration (comme la division de la Tchécoslovaquie). La troisième section, enfin, reprend les interrogations de la seconde, à propos du cas particulier des relations du Québec avec le reste du Canada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.025 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".