MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W632062167 · doi:10.5860/choice.40-2976

The Indian Association of Alberta: a history of political action

2003· article· en· W632062167 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueChoice Reviews Online · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoliticsAssociation (psychology)Action (physics)Political actionHistoryPolitical scienceLawPhilosophyEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Illustrations Acknowledgments Introduction 1. A General Setting 2. The Indian Association of Alberta: Its Origins and Structure 3. The Structure and Expansion of the Early Indian Association of Alberta 4. Outside Help: John Laurie and Non-Indian Supporters of the Indian Association of Alberta 5. The Indian Association of Alberta and Its Relations with the Indian Affairs Branch, 1939-46 6. Reconciling Citizenship and Treaty Rights: The Indian Association of Alberta and the Special Joint Committee of the Senate and House of Commons, 1946-48 7. Political Pragmatics: Amending the Indian Act, 1948-58 8. Political Visions: Diefenbaker to Trudeau 9. Nikanastewimakewin: Comparing the Political Thought of John Callihoo and John Tootoosis 10. Final Thoughts Appendices A. Indian Association of Alberta Executive Members, 1939-68 B. Supervisors of Local Department of Indian Affairs, Alberta, 1939-69 C. Indian Affairs Administration, 1939-69 D. Alberta Reserve Land Surrenders Notes Bibliography Index

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.090
Threshold uncertainty score0.655

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.011
Science and technology studies0.0140.008
Scholarly communication0.0080.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0270.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChoice Reviews OnlineSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207