MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W632240206 · doi:10.1385/1592590500

Calpain Methods and Protocols

2000· book· en· W632240206 on OpenAlexaff
John S. Elce

Bibliographic record

VenueHumana Press eBooks · 2000
Typebook
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCalpain Protease Function and Regulation
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersDivision of Molecular and Cellular BiosciencesNIH Clinical CenterUniversity of South CarolinaUniversity of California, Los AngelesUniversità degli Studi di GenovaLerner Research Institute, Cleveland ClinicTel Aviv UniversityDirectorate for Biological SciencesMagyar Tudományos AkadémiaCleveland Clinic FoundationCleveland ClinicColorado State University
KeywordsCalpainComputer scienceChemistryBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of Calpain Methods and Protocols is quite straightf- ward: it is to present the actual experimental methods used in many different laboratories for the study of calpain. It will provide th

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.068
Threshold uncertainty score0.226

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0680.093

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHumana Press eBooks→Same topicCalpain Protease Function and Regulation→French-language works237,207→