Bibliographic record
Abstract
Marcel Gauchet, dans son analyse de la condition politique, avait avance la these d'une mutation anthropologique majeure procedant de l'interiorisation psychique du modele de laquelle serait au cœur de la crise de l'articulation individu / collectif. Christian Laval s'inscrit dans cette interpretation et nous propose de comprendre l'avenement de l'homme economique par une archeologie de la pensee qui constitue le socle du neo-liberalisme. Pour autant, il se demarque de l'approche economiciste dans laquelle echoue la critique contemporaine de la societe de marche, qui revient a faire de l'economie capitaliste le seul reel a partir duquel tout s'explique. Pour lui, c'est l'emergence d'une nouvelle representation de l'homme et de son rapport au monde qui a pu œuvrer a la promotion d'une marchandisation extensive a la societe plus que l'inverse. Ce point de vue a le merite de rappeler les termes eminemment plus complexes de la dynamique performative et du nouage entre les discours et les pratiques. D'ou l'interet de mettre en lumiere les apports qui ont nourri ce qui se presente aujourd'hui comme discours dominant.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.021 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".