MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W632873695

INTEROPERABLE ELECTRONIC PAYMENT SYSTEMS IN CANADA: THE INTEGRATED MOBILITY SYSTEMS INITIATIVE

2001· article· en· W632873695 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mas Mustafa, Y Bialowas

Bibliographic record

Venue8th World Congress on Intelligent Transport SystemsITS America, ITS Australia, ERTICO (Intelligent Transport Systems and Services - Europe) · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicDigital Platforms and Economics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSmart cardInteroperabilityPaymentBusinessContext (archaeology)Payment cardLicenseService providerComputer securityContactless smart cardComputer scienceAccess controlService (business)World Wide WebMarketingFinance
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A Smart card is used as a powerful tool to provide different types of services with a high level of convenience and security. Services range from payment applications such as transit passes and tickets, parking payment, toll payment, etc. to non-payment applications, which include personal identification, access control, driving license and health care. Agencies from public and private sectors are provided, in using a smart card system, with a flexible tool to enhance data collection and support 'market driven' loyalty programmes to their customers. In this context, the multi-application smart card can be considered as a win-win case for both customers and service providers. The present paper provides a summary background on applications of smart cards and presents a Canadian consortium's approach to introduce a framework to assist in the introduction of interoperable multi-application smart card systems in Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.814
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue8th World Congress on Intelligent Transport SystemsITS America, ITS Australia, ERTICO (Intelligent Transport Systems and Services - Europe)Same topicDigital Platforms and EconomicsFrench-language works237,207