Determination of detailed stable isotope profiles and hydrogeologic conditions in a complex clay-rich aquitard, Saskatchewan, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Four techniques for obtaining δ¹⁸O and δ²H values in clay-rich geologic media were compared and evaluated. The results of this evaluation were then applied to a hydrogeologic investigation of a complex clay-rich aquitard system. The four techniques included mechanical squeezing, centrifugation, azeotropic distillation, and a direct soil-water equilibration technique. Direct CO₂-core equilibration yielded sufficiently accurate and reproducible δ¹⁸O results of pore water in clay-rich tills. Mechanical squeezing and centrifugation produced results similar to direct equilibration. Azeotropic distillation produced a high level of discrepancy in δ¹⁸O and δ²H results compared to the other methods. The results of this study suggested that direct equilibration is the best method for determining detailed δ²H and δ¹⁸O values of pore water in clay-rich aquitard systems. The aquitard system investigated in this study consisted of a thick Quaternary till overlying an intertill aquifer. A detailed vertical profile of pore water δ¹⁸O through the aquitard suggested that the till unit was divisible into three distinct hydrogeochemical zones: an upper zone (0 - 10.5 m), an intermediate (10.5 - 30m) zone, and a lower zone (30 - 62.5 m). A comparison of laboratory and field hydraulic conductivity (K) values suggested that the K in the upper 30 m of till is higher than the underlying till due to a system of interconnected fractures and sand layers. In contrast, results suggested that the lower zone (35 - 62.5 m) was not fractured but contained sand lenses or streaks. Results of K measurements supported the presence of three distinct zones suggested by the δ¹⁸O data. Bulk K was estimated to range from 3.2x10⁻⁹ to 3.4x10⁻⁸ m/s and 1x10⁻¹¹ to 1x10⁻¹⁰ m/s in the upper/intermediate and lower zone, respectively. Measured values of hydraulic head in the aquitard supported the contention that the lower zone had a significantly lower K than the overlying till. Although K in the upper and intermediate zones is high, these data suggest that active groundwater flow is limited to shallow localised zones. This investigation also shows that a three-dimensional study of groundwater flow at the site is warranted.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".