MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W63334643

Who's the American Indian on the MU Flag: A Timeline About Native Americans and Marquette University

2011· article· en· W63334643 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mark Thiel

Bibliographic record

Venuee-Publications@Marquette (Marquette University) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTimelineFlag (linear algebra)HistoryPolitical scienceMathematicsArchaeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 1869, Wilhelm Lamprecht painted this fanciful scene, "Father Marquette and the Indians", more than a decade before the University's founding in 1881.It depicts Jacques Marquette (1637-1675), S.J., during his epic exploration of the Mississippi River in 1673.Here he is on the lower Wisconsin River near its mouth where it empties into the Mississippi.In so doing, he is seeking guidance from a Native man with his family while two Native voyageurs steady the canoe.Modern scholars have identified the Native voyageurs as Metis, or men of mixed French and Indian ancestry, and Marquette's journals identify meeting villages of Mascoutin or Illinois and Miami Indians in presentday Wisconsin.Marquette University adopted its circular logo in 1907, which is comprised of its name, motto and founding year around the edge and images relating to its namesake in the center.The lower half includes Lamprecht's image of Marquette, the canoe and the voyageur in the bow; and the upper half includes the coat of arms of St. Ignatius of Loyola with symbols from his family."Numen Flumenique" is the University's motto, which means "God and the River".The blue edge and gold lettering derive from the French field flag used during the 17 th century.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.386
Threshold uncertainty score0.767

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0670.021
Scholarly communication0.0150.005
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0030.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuee-Publications@Marquette (Marquette University)Same topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207