Poor leadership and bad governance : reassessing presidents and prime ministers in North America, Europe and Japan
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Contents: 1. Poor Leadership and Bad Governance: Conceptual Perspectives and Questions for Comparative Inquiry Ludger Helms 2. In the Grip of Context: American Presidents and their Choices Bert A. Rockman 3. Not Necessarily Leadership But Leadership if Necessary: Canadian Prime Ministers and the Management of Expectations Jonathan Malloy 4. The United Kingdom: Prime Ministerial Leadership and the Challenge of Governance Gillian Peele 5. Presidents Behaving Badly: Poor Leadership and Bad Governance in France John Gaffney 6. Revisiting the German Chancellorship: Leadership Weakness and Democratic Autocracy in the Federal Republic Ludger Helms 7. Italy: Goodness, Badness, and the Trajectories of Mediocrity Gianfranco Pasquino 8. Leadership, Governance and Statecraft in Russia Richard Sakwa 9. Profiles in Discourage: Prime Ministerial Leadership in Post-war Japan Ellis S. Krauss and Robert Pekkanen 10. Conclusion Ludger Helms Index
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it