MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W634203955 · doi:10.5860/choice.50-1787

Maternalism reconsidered: motherhood, welfare and social policy in the twentieth century

2012· article· en· W634203955 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Marian van der Klein

Bibliographic record

VenueChoice Reviews Online · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWelfareSociologyGender studiesSocial policySocial WelfarePolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chapter 1. Introduction Rebecca Jo Plant and Marian van der Klein Chapter 2. Beyond Maternalism Sonya Michel Chapter 3. The State, the Women's Movement and Maternity Insurance, 1900-1930: A Dutch Maternalism? Marian van der Klein Chapter 4. Mobilising Mothers in the Nation's Service: Civic Culture in France's Familial Welfare State, 1890 - 1914 Lori R. Weintrob Chapter 5. Speaking on Behalf of Others:Dutch Social Workers and The Problem of Maternalist Condescension Berteke Waaldijk Chapter 6. 'Respectable Citizens of Canada': Gender and the Welfare State in the Great Depression Lara Campbell Chapter 7. The Gold Star Mothers Pilgrimages: Patriotic Maternalists and Their Critics in the Interwar U.S. Rebecca Jo Plant Chpaptr 8. Protecting Mothers in Order to Protect Children: Maternalism and the 1935 Pan-American Child Congress Nichole Sanders Chapter 9. Maternal and Child Welfare, State Policy and Women's Philanthropic Activities in Brazil, 1930-45 Maria Lucia Mott Chapter 10. Maternalism in a Paternalist State: The National Organization for the Protection of Motherhood and Infancy in Fascist Italy Elisabetta Vezzosi Chapter 11. Maternalism, Soviet-Style: The Working 'Mothers with Many Children' in Postwar Western Ukraine Yoshie Mitsuyoshi Chapter 12. Infant-Maternity Health and Nutritional Programmes in Argentina: Maternalism without Maternalists? Alma Idiart Chapter 13. Afterword: Maternalism Today Rebecca Jo Plant Select Bibliography Contributors

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.082

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.007
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.124
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations82
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChoice Reviews OnlineSame topicHistorical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal ChangesFrench-language works237,207