La perception spatio-temporelle de l’accessibilité automobile aux services urbains : Mesures pour la ville de Québec, 1993-2004
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les habitants évaluent différemment la proximité-accessibilité à divers types de services urbains. Leur décision de localisation, par l’achat d’une résidence, est influencée, en partie, par ces perceptions des accessibilités, révélatrices de la fonctionnalité et de la cohérence du système intra-urbain. Or, celles-ci peuvent varier à la fois dans l’espace et dans le temps. Ainsi, une meilleure compréhension des perceptions peut permettre d’améliorer les politiques d’aménagement urbain et de développement régional, afin de mieux répondre aux besoins de la population. L’article présente une méthodologie simple permettant de vérifier et d’évaluer l’évolution spatio-temporelle de la perception de l’accessibilité à divers types de services, afin d’alimenter les décisions publiques sur le territoire de la ville de Québec.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".