Time and Temporality in Language and Human Experience
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Contents: Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk/Krzysztof Kosecki: Introduction - Argiro Vatakis: TIMELY: A Network on Timing and Time Perception - Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk: Time and Time Experience in Language - Dwight Holbrook: Is Present Time a Precondition for the Existence of the Material and Public World? - James Moir: Time to Talk - Jacek Walinski: Complementarity of Space and Time in Motion-Framed Distance - Jacek Walinski: Atemporality of Coextension Paths - Janusz Badio: Temporal Parameters of Narrative Events: a Study of Unitizing a Videotaped Activity and its Verbal Coding - Jerzy Tomaszczyk: Investigating Perceptions of Lexical Obsolence - Martina Ivanova: Evidentiality and Temporal Perspective of Utterance - Joanna Latkowska: Creating the Timeline in English Narratives: the Bilingual Perspective - Dan Zakay/Dida Fleisig/Neta David: Prospective Timing During Conversations - Anna Esposito/Antonietta M. Esposito/Marilena Esposito: On Distinctive Visual and Auditory Timing Cues in Language Tasks - Andrzej Boguslawski: A Brief Account of a Negation Theory of the Slavonic Verbal Aspects - John Newman/Kristina Geeraert: TIME in a Semantically-annotated Corpus of Canadian English - Joanna Pawliczak: Time Metaphors in English - a Corpus-based Study - Krzysztof Kosecki: Metaphorical and Metonymic Representations of Time in Polish Sign Language - Agnes Leroux: Duration in English and in French: a Linguistic Description of the Relation Between a Process and a Time Interval - Michal B. Paradowski: Enhancing the Acquisition of Foreign-language Tense Properties - Valery Lichev: Relativity of Time in Belles-lettres - Jacek Wisniewski: When does an Era End? The Example of British Great War Poetry - Jadwiga Uchman: Time and Drama - the Last Soliloquy in Christopher Marlowe's Doctor Faustus - Sonia Front: Absent Presence - Quantum Time and Quantum Consciousness in Wilson Harris's Palace of the Peacock - Selga Goldmane: Translation of Time: from Literary Work to Screen in Stanley Kubrick's - Karen Heald/Susan Ligget: Time and the Chora: Transitory Strata and in-between-ness within Dream Films - Magdalena Zegarlinska: In the Darkness of Future Past. Time in David Lynch's Films.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".