MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W635127419

Euro Area Economy Gains Strength

2006· article· en· W635127419 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Wolfgang Pointner, Martin Schneider, Josef Schreiner

Bibliographic record

VenueMonetary Policy & the Economy · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicGerman Economic Analysis & Policies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEconomicsInflation (cosmology)PaceInvestment (military)UnemploymentMonetary economicsReal gross domestic productInterest rateOil priceChinaQuarter (Canadian coin)MacroeconomicsEconomyGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The world economy continues to expand, albeit at a slightly more subdued pace. In the U.S.A., the growth deceleration was primarily attributable to lower investment and weaker consumer spending. In response to these developments, the Federal Reserve kept the key interest rate steady in August 2006, after raising it 17 consecutive times over the past two years. In Japan, the economic recovery gathered enough steam for the Bank of Japan to hike interest rates in July for the first time in six years. China’s and Southeast Asia’s high growth rates remained broadly unchanged; inflationary pressures have increased in several countries of the region, above all because of the high oil price. The euro area economy continued to recover, with GDP growth exceeding expectations in the second quarter of 2006. Recent forecasts suggest that growth – which was carried primarily by domestic demand – will exceed potential growth in 2006, and unemployment is expected to decline markedly. Even though the short-term outlook for price stability has deteriorated owing to an increase in indirect taxes in Germany, the upward pressure on consumer prices may be expected to ease, as the oil price has decreased significantly since mid-August after triggering a rise in inflation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.114

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0340.017

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonetary Policy & the EconomySame topicGerman Economic Analysis & PoliciesFrench-language works237,207