MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Molecular and Biochemical Assays of Cartilage Components

2004· article· en· W6374825 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueHumana Press eBooks · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOsteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPapainChemistryHydroxyprolineChromatographyNucleic acidGuanidineCartilageBiochemistryExtraction (chemistry)BiologyEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The procedure described below is useful for extracting proteins, nucleic acids, and glycosaminoglycans from 5-40 mg of cartilage or tissue-engineered cartilage samples. This extraction method will generate samples compatible with Western blot, RNase protection, dimethyl methylene blue (DMB) assay for glycosaminoglycan, Hoechst DNA assay, and hydroxyproline assay. Most soluble matrix molecules can be extracted from pulverized samples using 4 M guanidine HCl, during a 30-min period of vortex agitation at 4 degrees C. Shorter agitation times can give inadequate solubilization. The guanidine HCl-insoluble pellet must be re-extracted with guanidine thiocyanate buffer, to solubilize RNA additionally. The final insoluble pellet can be rinsed with ethanol and digested with papain, to quantify collagen content as well as other insoluble or crosslinked material. Samples between 1 and 5 mg may be directly digested with a small volume of papain buffer for DMB, hydroxyproline, and Hoechst DNA assays.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.349

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it