MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W63757781 · doi:10.21236/ada438431

SPX: The Tenth International Conference on Stochastic Programming

2004· report· en· W63757781 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Julie Higle

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicComplex Systems and Decision Making
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAttendanceStochastic programmingOperations researchRepresentation (politics)Selection (genetic algorithm)Series (stratigraphy)Library scienceComputer scienceGeographyHistoryPolitical scienceMathematicsArtificial intelligenceGeologyMathematical optimizationLawPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SPX was the tenth in the series of international conferences on Stochastic Programming (SP) The first was held on the campus of Oxford University 30 years ago. Since then, the series of conferences has crossed the Atlantic Ocean several times (the last two meetings in North America were held in Ann Arbor MT (1989) and Vancouver BC (1995). Stochastic programming has emerged as one of the leading modeling paradigms for decision-making under uncertainty, and the current surge in interest in SP was reflected in the attendance at SPX. With representation from more than 25 nations, including students and faculty from a world-wide selection of universities, the conference was attended by more than 200 participants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.865
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.447
GPT teacher head0.489
Teacher spread0.041 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicComplex Systems and Decision MakingFrench-language works237,207