Distinguishing Aldehydes and Ketones in Ambient Air using SIFT-MS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Seventeen male and 20 female college students were tested on a bicycle ergometer in a hypobaric chamber to determine whether both sexes had similar submax and max exercise responses to acute hypoxia. Initial testing was at a terrestrial altitude of 1576 m, to which the subjects were acclimated; subsequent tests were at simulated altitudes of 2743 m and 3962 m. Analysis of covariance showed that inspired V was the only variable during submaximal work (50% max) to exhibit a significant difference in altitude response between males and females; women had a smaller increase than men. During max work, V and O2 pulse increased less in women. At 2743 m, max VO2 decreased more in females whereas, at 3962 m, no difference was noted. It was concluded that during both submaximal and maximal work with acute altitude exposure, women would demonstrate smaller relative increases in ventilation than would men.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".