Sustainability Assessment of the Hot Water Extraction Biorefinery Process Using a Phased Implementation Approach
Bibliographic record
Abstract
les principales sources d'impacts.Les options de bioraffinage, y compris le sirop d'hémicelluloses pour les sucres C5 et les sucres C5 présentent respectivement des réductions des gaz à effet de serre (GES) de 80 % et 68 %.En outre, les résultats montrent une amélioration considérable de la performance (plus de trois fois) dans la catégorie d'impact sur la santé humaine.En raison de la cohérence entre les résultats économiques, environnementaux et d'analyse des risques, l'identification de la stratégie la plus durable est simple.La coproduction du sel d'acétate et d'hémicellulose pour la fabrication de sucre C5 en phase I suivi par la coproduction du sel d'acétate et du sucre C5 en phase II, apparaît comme étant la stratégie de bioraffinage la plus prometteuse et durable.viii
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".