Correlation between electrocorticographic and motor phenomena in lindane-induced experimental epilepsy in ratsThis article is one of a selection of papers published in the special issue Bridging the Gap: Where Progress in Cardiovascular and Neurophysiologic Research Meet.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report a study on the relation between open-field behavior and electroencephalographic (EEG) changes during lindane-induced seizures in 2-month-old adult male Wistar rats. For chronic EEG recordings and power spectra analysis, 3 electrodes were implanted into the skull. Three groups of animals, (i) saline-injected control (n = 6), (ii) DMSO-treated (n = 6), and (iii) lindane intraperitoneally administered: L(4) (4 mg/kg, n = 10), L(6) (6 mg/kg, n = 11), and L(8) (8 mg/kg, n = 11), were observed for 30 min for the occurrence of convulsive behavior. It was assessed by incidence of motor seizures, and seizure severity grade was determined by a descriptive rating scale (0, no response; 1, head nodding, lower jaw twitching; 2, myoclonic body jerks, bilateral forelimb clonus with full rearing; 3, progression to generalized clonic convulsions followed by tonic extension of fore and hind limbs and tail; 4, status epilepticus). EEG signal and spectral analyses were suitable to describe the dynamics of complex behavioral responses. Incidence and severity of epileptic manifestations, recorded as high voltage spike-wave complexes, polyspikes, sleep-like patterns in EEG, and power spectra changes, were greater in lindane-treated groups in a dose-dependent manner compared with control or DMSO-treated groups. Our results suggest good correlation between lindane-induced epileptiform activity and behavioral changes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".