MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W63999323 · doi:10.1007/3-540-31801-1_11

A Mesh Adjustment Scheme for Embedded Boundaries

2006· book-chapter· en· W63999323 on OpenAlexaff
Jai Sachdev, C. P. T. Groth

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicComputational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBoundary (topology)Inviscid flowScheme (mathematics)DiscretizationBlock (permutation group theory)Mesh generationRepresentation (politics)Computer scienceFlow (mathematics)Laplacian smoothingAlgorithmMathematicsGeometryEngineeringMathematical analysisStructural engineeringFinite element methodAerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A mesh adjustment scheme has been described in which a body-fitted multi-block mesh is locally adjusted to embedded boundaries that are not aligned with the mesh. This scheme allows for quick and robust mesh generation involving complex embedded boundaries. The viability of this scheme has been demonstrated for stationary and moving embedded boundaries involving inviscid flow. The application of block-based AMR allows for a more detailed representation of the embedded boundary and accurate resolution of flows having multiple scales. An accuracy assessment of viscous discretization operators on the adjusted mesh is currently under investigation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicComputational Fluid Dynamics and AerodynamicsFrench-language works237,207