MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

The experience of a sample of Canadian men with breast cancer

2006· article· en· W640291790 on OpenAlexaffabout
Edith Pituskin, Beverly Williams, Kristine Martin‐McDonald, H. Au

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBRCA gene mutations in cancer
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBreast cancerFeelingCancerMalignancyQualitative researchFamily medicineGynecologyInternal medicinePsychologySocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

10549 Background: Breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed malignancy among North American women, accounting for about 30% of all new cases each year. Although male breast cancer accounts for less than 1% of all breast cancer cases, recent reports indicate significantly increasing incidence. Research suggests that men diagnosed with breast cancer experience serious psychologic issues including feeling less masculine by having a woman’s disease, feeling isolated with a rare malignancy and feeling uncomfortable seeking or receiving support. Men may also experience post-surgical effects including changed appearance of the male chest and decreased arm strength. There have been numerous large-scale studies examining womens’ experiences with breast cancer. To date, there have been no North American studies examining what a man experiences with a breast cancer diagnosis. The objective of this qualitative study was to determine the experiences of a sample of Canadian men diagnosed with breast cancer. Methods: After ethics approval, an invitation letter and consent form were mailed to those individuals listed as “male”, “breast cancer”, and “alive”, in the Alberta Cancer Registry. 20 men responded indicating their interest. After written consent, audiotaped interviews were conducted. As little is known about a man’s experience with breast cancer, an exploratory qualitative methodology was utilized. Results: We found a great variability among the participants with respect to whom they disclosed their diagnosis, how they viewed their masculinity after a breast cancer diagnosis and their views on life after a cancer experience. All participants stated that there was a major lack of awareness about male breast cancer, both in the public and health professional domain. All participants identified a lack of written information specific for men with breast cancer. All participants denied interest in traditional “support” groups, but would have welcomed the opportunity to speak with a man who had gone through similar diagnosis and treatment. Conclusions: Needs identified by the respondents include increased medical and public awareness of male breast cancer as well as specific written information. Further research is necessary to identify supports and resources helpful for male patients. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.231

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0210.005
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.404
Teacher spread0.361 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicBRCA gene mutations in cancer→French-language works237,207→