MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W641223833

The application of GIS and Remote Sensing Techniques for the study of Coastal Dunes Evolution. Case study at Greenwich Dunes, PEI National Park

2008· article· en· W641223833 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueEdge Hill University Research Information Repository (Edge Hill University) · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAeolian processes and effects
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAeolian processesBeach morphodynamicsRemote sensingFetchForeduneDigital elevation modelShoreGeologySediment transportEnvironmental scienceGeomorphologyOceanographySediment
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The lack of high quality, long-term field data has hampered the quantitative analysis of beach-dune systems, which has been partially overcome during the last decade by utilizing video imaginary to monitor long-term variations of rip currents, sand bars, or shoreline position. The use of remote sensing techniques in aeolian studies is at a very starting point though, and researchers are now realizing its potential for measuring fetch distances or moisture content at the beach. There are a number of issues associated with the different temporal/spatial scales of factors affecting the aeolian system, which are difficult to monitor during short-term experiments and which prevent numerical predictions of coastal dune evolution of being accurate over the medium scale. This paper reports on the application of remote sensing techniques to model aeolian processes in coastal areas, and its potential in establishing links between factors acting at different temporal scales. Digital SLR cameras have been installed at Greenwich Dunes in PEI National Park (Canada), each one taking hourly-continuous exposures of the beach and dune during daylight hours. A 2D sonic anemometer mounted at the top of the mast provides record of wind speed and direction. Sediment transport and deposition/erosion processes are measured using a set of Sabatech saltation probes and pins permanently deployed at the backshore area and at the base of the foredunes. The images are rectified into UTM coordinates and analysed following a set of post processing techniques with PCI Geomatica and ArcMap. The result is a large geodatabase with several layers of numerical information, such as detailed moisture maps or vegetation cover, and time series of wind characteristics and transport processes at the beach. This geodatabse is a primary source of information for modeling the aeolian system at Greenwich. The monitoring of the magnitude, frequency, and timing of events that deliver sediment to the dune will allow us to understand the relative importance of different key variables. The overall goal is to improve numerical predictions of aeolian input from the beach to the dune at mesoscale, and advance our knowledge in the key factors affecting foredune evolution to better assist management projects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.439
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it