MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W641618483 · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2015.05.027

Analysis on the Effect of Adopting Green SLA on Optical WDM Networks

2015· article· en· W641618483 on OpenAlexaff
Yashar Fazili, Alireza Nafarieh, Muhammad Hassan Raza, Bill Robertson, William Philips

Bibliographic record

VenueProcedia Computer Science · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Optical Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceWavelength-division multiplexingTelecommunicationsComputer networkOptoelectronicsWavelength

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper analyzes the effect of Green Service Level Agreement (GSLA) on resource efficiency and emission reduction of wavelength-division multiplex (WDM) optical networks governed by Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS). Green routing mechanisms may use more resources in serving equal number of connection requests in optical networks, which makes them less favorable for Internet and infrastructure providers. This work shows that the usage of green and hybrid routing mechanism is in fact more resource efficient than using traditional non-green routing methods by simply choosing the greenest route. The amount of greenness of routes in optical networks is requested through GSLA mandating service providers to provide routes for connection requests that are being powered ON by at least certain amount of green energy such as solar energy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProcedia Computer ScienceSame topicAdvanced Optical Network TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207