MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W642001357

A Tale of Two Bridges

2005· article· en· W642001357 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Tyson Herman

Bibliographic record

VenueBridges Conversations in Global Politics and Public Policy · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBeam (structure)Structural health monitoringStructural engineeringFlexural strengthForensic engineeringEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Defiance, Ohio recently completed a project involving the structural rehabilitation of two bridges. To optimize the strength of the repaired structures, an innovative solution was developed involving post-tensioning externally bonded carbon fiber laminates. This article describes this pioneering project. One of the objectives of the repair was to restore the flexural capacity of the beams by reintroducing the compressive force lost to deterioration of prestressing strands. The key to this project was the installation of the post-tensioned carbon fiber plates. To begin the project, the beams were jacked up to replace deteriorated bearing pads. The next step was to repair the deteriorated concrete on the prestressed box beam. Existing asphalt pavement then was removed and the beams were post-tensioned using fiber-reinforced polymer laminates. To complete the project, the asphalt was returned with new drainage to keep stormwater from running over the repaired beams. A structural health monitoring system was installed to provide information on the longevity of these bridges and to determine if these techniques are appropriate for other bridges.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.918
Threshold uncertainty score0.757

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBridges Conversations in Global Politics and Public PolicySame topicStructural Behavior of Reinforced ConcreteFrench-language works237,207