MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W642154409

So what can we actually do with content-based video retrieval?

2009· article· en· W642154409 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Alan F. Smeaton

Bibliographic record

VenueArrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVideo Analysis and Summarization
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversidad Rey Juan CarlosXi’an Jiaotong UniversityQueensland University of TechnologyQueen Mary University of LondonShanghai Jiao Tong UniversityUniversity of Southern CaliforniaTsinghua UniversityUniversity of GlasgowUniversity of OttawaCity University of Hong KongUniversity of Central FloridaUniversidad Carlos III de Madrid
KeywordsMetadataBenchmarkingSearch engine indexingComputer scienceInformation retrievalComplement (music)World Wide WebDigital videoVideo retrievalMultimediaFrame (networking)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this talk I will give a roller-coaster survey of the state of the art in automatic video analysis, indexing, summarisation, search and browsing as demonstrated in the annual TRECVid benchmarking evaluation campaign. I will concentrate on content-based techniques for video management which form a complement to the dominant paradigm of metadata or tag-based video management and I will use example techniques to illustrate these.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.626
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology)Same topicVideo Analysis and SummarizationFrench-language works237,207