MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W642439267

When Winter Comes Calling

2014· article· en· W642439267 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mischa Wanek-Libman

Bibliographic record

VenueRailway track and structures · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSmart Materials for Construction
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBackupPlan (archaeology)Resilience (materials science)Extreme weatherKey (lock)EngineeringTransport engineeringComputer scienceComputer securityClimate change
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Winter provides an operational challenge that can put railroads into a chaos that can lead to hampered operations, congested networks, and constrained volume growth. Canadian National (CN) has developed WinterREADY, a detailed plan to prepare for winter weather challenges. The plan is designed to promote network fluidity in extreme weather conditions in an effort to improve network capacity and resilience. The objective of the railroad’s response plan is to ensure continual goods movement by having alternate plans for key terminals and yards, readying cold weather detour schedules, and redirecting workflow to improve response time. CN said the rigorous response plan was the result of listening to customers to learn and adapt to a better position by adding resiliency and better, more timely communication throughout the network. In addition to major capacity enhancements and productivity initiatives, the railroad has augmented its snow fighting equipment fleet, adding backup generators with fail-over and auto start features, and providing new lifting equipment at key locations. In addition, the railroad has developed a strategy to make better use of power when an event occurs. Highlights of the power strategy include performing a winter maintenance blitz on all system locomotives, introducing high-capacity alternating current locomotives, and upgrading locomotives to prevent snow ingestion and protect radiators from snow accumulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.071
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRailway track and structuresSame topicSmart Materials for ConstructionFrench-language works237,207