Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this list I provide the date, venue, and director for stage productions included in this book. Unless otherwise noted, references to the Royal Shakespeare Company are to productions in the two large theatres (the Royal Shakespeare Theatre in Stratford, the Barbican in London) as opposed to the Swan, The Other Place (TOP), and the Pit. I do not distinguish between Oregon Shakespeare Festival productions at the Elizabethan Stagehouse and the Bowmer, Royal National Theatre productions at the Olivier and Lyttleton, and Stratford Festival Canada productions at the Festival Theatre and the Avon. When I supply two consecutive years for a RSC production ( Richard III , 1995–96), the later date refers to a remounting at the Barbican in London or on tour which was the version I actually saw. Not included in this list are (1) several shows to which I refer but did not see (for example, the Peter Brook 1955 Titus Andronicus ); (2) Jane Howell's productions of the Henry VI plays and Titus Andronicus for BBC-TV's “The Shakespeare Plays”; and (3) several movies cited in passing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.011 | 0.018 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.788 | 0.627 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".