Bibliographic record
Abstract
Contents: Foreword Introduction Part 1 Customary Law Foundations of Modern Law and Justice: Are traditions, customs, and native laws impotent in the face of modernity? Part 2 Indigenous versus Foreign Social Controls in 12 Selected Countries: Introduction to part 2 Indigenous versus foreign controls in selected countries: Afghanistan, India, Iraq, Saudi Arabia Indigenous versus foreign controls in selected countries: Brazil, Kenya, Nigeria, South Africa Indigenous versus foreign controls in selected countries: Australia, Canada, Japan, United States of America Part 2 summary and conclusion: lessons from the countries surveyed. Part 3 Elements in Law and Justice Reconstruction: Introduction to part 3 Obstacles to indigenizing law and justice: a case study of post-British Nigeria Model law and justice: legislation and enforcement Model law and justice: adjudication and corrections. Part 4 For a Fresh Philosophy of Justice: Introduction to part 4 Sharing the responsibility of law and justice renewal Summary and conclusion: checking the excesses of official criminalization in a postcolony: towards increased role for civil response in a reconstructed law and justice system Appendix Index.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".