MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W643685500

TRIED-AND-TRUE INFRASTRUCTURE IN CANADA: GUIDE ASSEMBLES BEST PRACTICES FOR MUNICIPALITIES

2003· article· en· W643685500 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
N Levac, J J Hajek, D K Hein

Bibliographic record

VenueTR news · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInfrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCompendiumBest practiceSanitary sewerBusinessEnvironmental planningPublic infrastructureCritical infrastructurePlan (archaeology)EngineeringPolitical scienceManagementGeographyEnvironmental engineeringEconomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The National Guide to Sustainable Municipal Infrastructure: Innovation and Best Practices aims to assist Canadian municipalities and other infrastructure owners with a decision-making and investment-planning tool, as well as a compendium of technical best practices. The guide deals with planning, management, and construction issues for all major components of municipal infrastructure, including roads, potable water distribution systems, sewers, and transit systems. The first version of the guide comprises more than 40 best practices and should be available in 2005. Draft best practices are posted on a website (www.infraguide.gc.ca) to solicit public and peer review comments before final publication.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.799
Threshold uncertainty score0.617

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTR newsSame topicInfrastructure Maintenance and MonitoringFrench-language works237,207