Bibliographic record
Abstract
The fifth edition of the Canadian Urban Transit Association's (CUTA) transit infrastructure needs survey has estimated the infrastructure requirements of transit systems across the country to be $40.1 billion for the period 2008-2012. Canada's infrastructure needs over the period include bus, subway, LRT and commuter car purchases and refurbishment, development and construction of fixed guideways and rights-of-way such as BRT and LRT, new and improved maintenance facilities, stations and terminals, new park and ride facilities, the implementation of transit priority measures, new customer amenities. Transit systems were asked to list their budgeted capital infrastructure needs for the next five years (2008-2012) by dollar value. These were categorized by expenditures for replacement or rehabilitation, expenditures for expansion in response to population growth or promotion of new ridership; expenditures currently planned (under existing funding programs) and additional needs that can only be met through new external investment. Currently many transit systems are operating at or beyond their design capacity, and some systems are facing significant latent demand that cannot be satisfied without major investment in service improvement and capacity expansion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".