MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W644325252

Road safety in the City of Whitehorse

2004· article· en· W644325252 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
I Goodes, I Kostopoulos, L Mcguinness

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTraffic and Road Safety
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnforcementTransport engineeringGovernment (linguistics)Local governmentLaw enforcementBus priorityRoad trafficEngineeringBusinessPublic transportPublic administrationPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Whitehorse is a mix of residential streets, bustling shopping centres and high technology precincts. The Eastern Freeway, extending from Hoddle Street, inner Melbourne, currently terminates in the middle of our municipality at Springvale Road. From this point, motorists are faced with an arterial road that was not designed to carry current traffic volumes, collector roads acting as arterial roads and local streets that are used extensively by through traffic. The State Government proposes to extend the freeway to Frankston by 2008. This unique circumstance has meant that the City of Whitehorse has to adopt a range of measures to tackle traffic management and road safety. Specific road safety programs are delivered through a range of Council activities. Council has developed a Road Safety Strategy and Traffic Management Strategy that sit within the umbrella of an Integrated Transport Strategy. These strategies guide Council in its decision making and highlight the importance of integrating behavioural, engineering and enforcement measures to improve road safety. (a) For the covering entry of this conference, please see ITRD abstract no. E211954.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.425
Threshold uncertainty score0.856

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTraffic and Road Safety→French-language works237,207→