MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W64435707

SPEED BUMPS: A STUDENT-FRIENDLY GUIDE TO QUALITATIVE RESEARCH (Authors: L. Weis & M. Fine)

2001· article· fr· W64435707 on OpenAlexaff
Vladimir Spicanovic

Bibliographic record

VenueMcGill Journal of Education / Revue des sciences de l'éducation de McGill · 2001
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicQualitative Research Methods and Applications
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematics educationComputer scienceComputer graphics (images)Mathematics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L. WEIS & M. FINE. Speed Bumps: A student-friendly guide to qualitative research. New York. NY: Teachers College. Columbia University (2000). 144 pp. US$ 16.95 (ISBN 0-8077-3966-9).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.028
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.060
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.120
Threshold uncertainty score0.401

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0280.060
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.005
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0040.006
Research integrity0.0020.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1200.054

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.691
GPT teacher head0.689
Teacher spread0.003 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMcGill Journal of Education / Revue des sciences de l'éducation de McGillSame topicQualitative Research Methods and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207