MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W644822314

Transforming undergraduate education : theory that compels and practices that succeed

2011· article· en· W644822314 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Donald W. Harward

Bibliographic record

VenueRowman & Littlefield Education · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGlobal Education Systems and Policies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLiberal arts educationLiberal educationTransformative learningSociologyHigher educationEnvironmental ethicsPedagogyPolitical scienceLawPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Forewords Julie J. Kidd Sally Engelhard Pingree Acknowledgments Introduction Part I. The Theoretical Arguments and Themes Donald W. Harward Part II. The Issues, Rationale, Constraints and Practices Chapter 1: A Copernican Moment: On the Revolutions in Higher Education David M. Scobey Chapter 2: The Ideals of the Liberal Artisan: Notes towards an Evolving Group Biography Catharine R. Stimpson Chapter 3: The Theories, Contexts, and Multiple Pedagogies of Engaged Learning: What Succeeds and Why? Lynn E. Swaner Chapter 4: Reuniting the Often Neglected Aims of Liberal Education: Student Well-Being and Psychosocial Development Dessa Bergen-Cico Chapter 5: Renewing the Civic Purpose of Liberal Education Barry N. Checkoway, Richard Guarasci and Peter L. Levine Chapter 6: Evoking Wholeness: To Renew the Ideal of the Educated Person Theodore E. Long Chapter 7: Knowledge and Judgment in Practice as the Twin Aims of William M. Sullivan Chapter 8: Assessment and Evaluative Studies as Change Agents in the Academy Ashley P. Finley Chapter 9: Fostering Faculty Leadership for Sustainable Change in the Academy Adrianna J. Kezar and Alice (Jill) N. Reich Chapter 10: Threshold Concepts of Teaching and that Transform Faculty Practice (and the Limits of Individual Change) Kenneth R. Bain and Randall J. Bass Chapter 11: Financing Change: Priorities, Resources, and Community Involvement Kent John Chabotar Part III. Implications Likely to Follow from Sustained Transformative Changes Chapter 12: International Perspectives on Liberal Education: An Assessment in Two Parts A: International Insights on the Essence of the Liberal Arts Richard A. Detweiler B: International Perspectives on Liberal Education: Polish Case Example Jerzy Axer Chapter 13: Implications of Transformative Change in Higher Education for Secondary Education: A Dialogue Daniel Tad Roach and Michael V. McGill Chapter 14: Do Disciplines Change? Would Flipping the Curriculum Right-Side Up Lead to Change? Thomas Bender Chapter 15: Liberal Education and the Policy Landscape Carol Geary Schneider and Debra Humphreys Part IV. Successful Models and Practices Chapter 16: Introduction to Case Studies Ashley P. Finley Case Studies and Best Practices Chapter 17: Public Sphere Pedagogy: Connecting Student Work to Public Arenas-California State University, Chico (California) Cynthia Wolf and William M. Loker Chapter 18: Engaging Faculty in Learning Communities: Lessons Learned-Dickinson College (Pennsylvania) Shalom Staub Chapter 19: Curriculum Infusion: Educating the Whole Student and Creating Campus Change- Georgetown University (Washington DC) Joan B. Riley and Mindy McWilliams Chapter 20: Attempting Organizational Transformational from the Ground Up: Lessons Learned-Montclair State University (New Jersey) Valerie I. Sessa Chapter 21: Implementation of Peer Led Team Learning, a Leadership Initiative and Establishment of a New Faculty Track as Examples of Institutional Change-Morehouse College (Georgia) Jann H. Adams and John K. Haynes Chapter 22: Listening to the Agents of Pedagogical Change-St. Lawrence University (New York) Catherine A. Crosby-Currie & Christine Zimmerman Chapter 23: An Enduring Experiment-The Evergreen State College (Washington) Phyllis Lane and Elizabeth McHugh Chapter 24: Building the Capacity to Lead: Lessons Learned in the Evolution of the Leader Development System-United States Military Academy at West Point (New York) Bruce Keith Chapter 25: Building Institutional Capacity to Forge Civic Pathways-University of Nebraska, Lincoln (Nebraska) Nancy D. Mitchell and Linda J. Major Chapter 26: Successful Models and Practices-Wagner College (New York) Devorah A. Lieberman and Cassia Freedland Contributor Biographies Index

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.020
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.034
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.107

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0200.034
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.038
Scholarly communication0.0170.014
Open science0.0020.008
Research integrity0.0040.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.373
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRowman & Littlefield EducationSame topicGlobal Education Systems and PoliciesFrench-language works237,207