MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W645423192

The Constitutional Implications of the Hudson Decision: Lessons for Adapting to the Health Effects of Climate Change in Canada

2013· article· en· W645423192 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Carolyn Poutiainen

Bibliographic record

VenueAppeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicClimate Change and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClimate changeHarmGreenhouse gasAdaptation (eye)ExploitHuman systems engineeringEnvironmental resource managementEnvironmental planningAction (physics)Political economy of climate changeNatural resource economicsPolitical scienceEnvironmental scienceEconomicsPsychologyEcologyComputer scienceComputer security
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Climate change policy is divided into two main types of action, mitigation and adaptation. Mitigation refers mainly to interventions aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions at the source.1 Adaptation refers to “adjustment in natural or human systems in response to actual or expected climatic stimuli or their effects, which moderates harm or exploits beneficial opportunities.”2 Historically, adaptation has been viewed as the poor cousin of climate change mitigation,3 but it is now seen as a crucial component of climate change policy.4

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.026
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.150
Threshold uncertainty score0.986

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.026
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0170.017
Scholarly communication0.0110.003
Open science0.0050.003
Research integrity0.0130.012
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAppeal: Review of Current Law and Law ReformSame topicClimate Change and Health ImpactsFrench-language works237,207