L'élection de 1830 dans le comté Saint-Hyacinthe : identités élitaires et solidarités paroissiales, sociales ou familiales
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The study of voting behaviour in Quebec in the nineteenth century usually aims to determine the impact of an ideology (liberalism or nationalism) or of a political party (Patriote or Rouge) on some social or ethnic group in some region (county, city, or neighbourhood). This study of the election of 1830 in the county of Saint- Hyacinthe takes a somewhat different approach. The portrait of the candidates and analysis of voting behaviour fits, rather, into a question more specifically linked to the social history of rural communities. This study seeks to clarify the importance of social, parish, or family membership in the overall sphere of rural politics. This research also enhances knowledge of the concept of the social elite in rural communities. Some farmers were able to raise themselves to the level of principal local or regional notables. However, the social and political cohesion of the village elites remained much stronger than that of elites rising from rural society. As well, parish and client connections had greater influence on voting behaviour than did the family networks of the candidates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".