Let right be done : Aboriginal title, the Calder case, and the future of Indigenous rights
Bibliographic record
Abstract
1 The Calder Decision, Aboriginal Title, Treaties, and the Nisga'a / Christina Godlewska and Jeremy Webber Part 1: Reflections of the Calder Participants 2 Frank Calder and Thomas Berger: A Conversation 3 Reminiscences of Aboriginal Rights at the Time of the Calder Case and Its Aftermath / Honourable Gerard V. La Forest Part 2: Historical Background 4 We Are Not O'Meara's Children: Law, Lawyers, and the First Campaign for Aboriginal Title in British Columbia, 1908-28 / Hamar Foster 5 Then Fight For It: William Lewis Paul and Alaska Native Land Claims / Stephen Haycox Part 3: Calder and Its Implications 6 Calder and the Representation of Indigenous Society in Canadian Jurisprudence / Michael Asch 7 A Taxonomy of Aboriginal Rights / Brian Slattery 8 Judicial Approaches to Self-Government since Calder: Searching for Doctrinal Coherence / Kent McNeil Part 4: International Impact 9 Customary Rights and Crown Claims: Calder and Aboriginal Title in Aotearoa New Zealand / David V. Williams 10 The Influence of Canadian and International Law on the Evolution of Australian Aboriginal Title / Garth Nettheim Part 5: The Future 11 Let Obligations Be Done / John Borrows 12 Closing Thoughts: Final Remarks from Iona Campagnolo, Lance Finch, Joseph Gosnell, and Frank Calder Appendices Notes Bibliography Index
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.021 | 0.026 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.008 | 0.009 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".