MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W646090988 · doi:10.4326/jjcvs.41.139

Reoperation in Two Patients with SJM Toronto SPV and Medtronic Freestyle Stentless Bioprosthetic Valves

2012· article· en· W646090988 on OpenAlexaffabout
Yuki Ichihara, Akihiko Kawai, Satoshi Saito, Kenji Yamazaki

Bibliographic record

VenueJapanese Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsMedtronic (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCardiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

高齢者の大動脈弁狭窄症など生体弁を用いた弁置換術が適応となる疾患に対し,従来のステント付き弁に代わり,耐久性および有効弁口面積といった点で優れるステントレス弁の使用が近年報告されている.今回われわれは2種類の代表的なステントレス弁,SJM-Toronto SPVとMedtronic Freestyle valveの再手術例を経験した.SJM-Toronto SPVでは自己組織との癒着・石灰化が著明で移植弁を可及的に摘出するにとどまり,結果的に小さいサイズの機械弁による再置換を余儀なくされた.一方,Medtronic Freestyle valveは癒着が軽度で,移植弁自体を容易に摘出することができ自己組織の温存が図れたことで,ステントレス弁による再置換が可能となった.いずれのステントレス弁も優れた10年前後の長期遠隔成績が報告されているが,近年は再手術症例も認められ始めており,より慎重な経過観察が必要である.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0040.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJapanese Journal of Cardiovascular SurgerySame topicCardiac Valve Diseases and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207