MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W646307666

The Effect on Systemic and Pulmonary Circulations in the Resuscitation of Asphyxiated Newborn Piglets with 21%, 50% or 100% Oxygen

2003· article· en· W646307666 on OpenAlexaff
Erika Haase, Jonathan Stevens, Vincent Rigo, Richards, David L. Bigam, Po‐Yin Cheung

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège) · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAsphyxiaResuscitationMedicineHypoxia (environmental)Shock (circulatory)AnesthesiaAsphyxia NeonatorumCardiopulmonary resuscitationPersistent pulmonary hypertensionPulmonary hypertensionOxygenIntensive care medicineCardiologyInternal medicineChemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Neonatal asphyxia can lead to complications such as shock and persistent pulmonary hypertension (PHT).A hypoxia-reoxygenation process may be created in the resuscitation of asphyxiated newborns and indeed, may contribute to further complications.Resuscitation with room air has been suggested to be as effective as 100% oxygen, but limited information is available in the graded reoxygenation of asphyxiated newborns.OBJECTIVE: To examine the cardiovascular effects of resuscitation with 21, 50 or 100% oxygen in asphyxiated newborn piglets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège)→Same topicCardiac Arrest and Resuscitation→French-language works237,207→