One hundred at 360° : graphic design's new global generation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction Designers' Work in alphabetical order Abraka, France Accept & Proceed, UK Alter, Australia Matthew Appleton, UK A Practice For Everyday Life, UK Attak, The Netherlands Danielle Aubert, USA BB/Saunders, UK Beautiful/Decay, USA Alexandre Bettler, UK Nirit Binyamini, Israel Chris Bolton, Finland Bunch, UK/Singapore/Croatia Circuit73, USA Malcolm Clarke, UK Cobbenhagen & Hendriksen, The Netherlands Container, UK Coolmix, Germany Jella Crama, Belgium Cut-up Design, UK Frederique Daubal, France deValence, France Dextro, Austria Dixonbaxi, UK Dress Code, USA forcefeed: swede, Australia Farhad Fozouni, Iran Hugh Frost, UK Gaffa, UK George&Vera, UK Amirali Ghasemi, Iran Giampietro+Smith, USA Grandpeople, Norway Hans Gremmen, The Netherlands Hansje van Halem, The Netherlands Happypets, Switzerland Pierre Hourquet, France Hudson-Powell, Japan/UK Apirat Infahsaeng, USA Inksurge, The Philippines It is blank, Lithuania IWANT, UK J6 Studios, USA Miss Karen Jane, UK June, France Kallegraphics, Norway karlssonwilker Inc, USA Kinetic, Singapore Kiosk, UK Daniel Kluge, Germany KURZ:HAUG, Germany Fernando Leal, Brazil Ian Lynam, Japan M&E, UK MAKI, The Netherlands Russell Mann, Australia MARC&ANNA, UK MASA, Venezuela Kieran McCann, UK Clare McNally, The Netherlands Mode, UK Tom Munckton, UK No Days Off, UK Node, Germany One Day Nation, The Netherlands One-Fine-Day, UK Pandarosa, Australia Peter and Paul, UK Petpunk, Lithuania PixelNouveau, Spain Plusminus, USA Qube Konstrukt, Australia Carsten Raffel, Germany Adam Rix, UK Richard Sarson, UK Satian:Studio, USA Jens Schildt, The Netherlands Seripop, Canada Natasha Shah, UK Astrid Stavro, Spain Frauke Stegmann, South Africa Stiletto nyc, USA Studio 8, UK Studio Tonne, UK Syrup Helsinki, Finland TenTenTen, Japan Frederic Teschner, France The Mighty, Serbia The Remingtons, Switzerland The Small Stakes, USA Clarissa Tossin, Brazil Nicole Udry, Switzerland Vanillusaft, Iceland Vault 49, USA Via Grafik, Germany Vivian Cipolla, UK Voegeli jtv, Switzerland Wallzo, UK Bianca Wendt, Turkey Zak Group, UK Contact details, designer biographies and project credits in an equatorial section in the center of the book.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.165 | 0.032 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".