MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W648617424

PATH TRACKING, OBSTACLE AVOIDANCE AND DEAD RECKONING BY AN AUTONOMOUS PLANETARY ROVER

2014· article· en· W648617424 on OpenAlexaff
D.N. Green, Jurek Z. Sąsiadek

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Heavy Vehicle Systems · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicRobotic Path Planning Algorithms
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDead reckoningObstacle avoidanceComputer visionOdometryTrajectoryInertial measurement unitSensor fusionArticulated vehicleObstacleComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceCollision avoidancePath (computing)EngineeringMobile robotGlobal Positioning SystemAerospace engineeringRobotGeographyCollision
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a set of algorithms for piloting an autonomous planetary rover along a planned path, performing real–time obstacle avoidance and improving a dead reckoning capability. Path tracking is accomplished using linear regulation (feedback) of position and orientation errors, measured with respect to the planned path trajectory. Obstacle avoidance is performed through the application of the concept of an artificial potential field to data that can be acquired using a scanning rangefinder. Dead reckoning is improved by the algorithmic filtering and fusing of odometry and inertial navigation data streams. Computer simulation is used to illustrate the path–tracking and obstacle–avoidance capabilities, and experimental data is used to show how sensor fusion mitigates the effects of wheel–slippage and integration–error in dead reckoning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Heavy Vehicle SystemsSame topicRobotic Path Planning AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207